Postmodernism Portion of FInal Exam

"American Idiot" vs. "21st Century Breakdown"


Armstrong, Billie Joe. "American Eulogy: Mass Hysteria." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "American Eulogy: Modern World." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. American Idiot. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Are We the Waiting. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Before the Lobotomy." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Boulevard of Broken Dream. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Christian's Inferno." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "East Jesus Nowhere." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Extraordinary Girl. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Give Me Novocaine. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Holiday. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Homecoming. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Horseshoes and Hand Grenades." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Jesus of Suburbia. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Know Your Enemy." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Last Night on Earth." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Last of the American Girls." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Letterbomb. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Murder City." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Peacemaker." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Restless Heart Syndrome." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "See the Light." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. She's a Rebel. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "Song of the Century." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. St. Jimmy. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "The Static Age." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "21 Guns." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "21st Century Breakdown." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "?Viva La Gloria? (Little Girl)." Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. "!Viva La Gloria!" Green Day. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Wake Me Up When September Ends. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Armstrong, Billie Joe. Whatsername. Oakland: Reprise Records, 2004. Print.

Colapinto, John. "Working Class Heroes." Rolling Stone. 17 Nov. 2005. Web. 21 May 2011. .

Sheffield, Rob. "American Idiot by Green Day." Rolling Stone. 30 Sept. 2004. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Sheffield, Rob. "21st Century Breakdown by Green Day." Rolling Stone. 17 Apr. 2009. Web. 17 May 2011. .

Inception and Post Modernism

Inception is a large movie that was a massive hit across the United States that was in theaters about a year ago from now. It was all about how people could go into dreams and extract information from other people's minds. It was a very interesting movie that is definitely in my favorite movies of all time. Inception is not only just a great movie, but it also fits into the literary genre of post modernism. One characteristic we see of post modernism within the movie Inception is there are several different worlds we are in. They are not too different from earth, but they are other people's "dream worlds." It is how they imagine the world to be in their sleep. We see one of these worlds is in Cobb's "limbo." Cobb takes his wife to Mall this dream world and they live a whole life together within this dream world. In all actuality, they were only in this world for a short time within one of their dreams. So there is one post modernism characteristic within the movie Inception. We also see a small ethnic diversity within this movie. The main man who wants the information is actually of an Asian ethnicity. This is where we see an ethnic diversity that we have not seen in the literary periods before post modernism. Inception is a large criss-cross between the boundaries of fiction and nonfiction. I believe this is a mix between the fiction and nonfiction worlds because it is imaginable to do this, but it is just not possible at all to do this so that makes this part of the storyline fiction. But then the rest of the time it is just like a normal life so it is in the world of nonfictionality. Overall, I really liked the movie Inception and it shows many characteristics of post modernism. Maybe you can see some other characteristics too! Inception is in the post modernism literary genre.

Inception and Post Modernism

Inception is a large movie that was a massive hit across the United States that was in theaters about a year ago from now. It was all about how people could go into dreams and extract information from other people's minds. It was a very interesting movie that is definitely in my favorite movies of all time. Inception is not only just a great movie, but it also fits into the literary genre of post modernism. One characteristic we see of post modernism within the movie Inception is there are several different worlds we are in. They are not too different from earth, but they are other people's "dream worlds." It is how they imagine the world to be in their sleep. We see one of these worlds is in Cobb's "limbo." Cobb takes his wife to Mall this dream world and they live a whole life together within this dream world. In all actuality, they were only in this world for a short time within one of their dreams. So there is one post modernism characteristic within the movie Inception. We also see a small ethnic diversity within this movie. The main man who wants the information is actually of an Asian ethnicity. This is where we see an ethnic diversity that we have not seen in the literary periods before post modernism. Inception is a large criss-cross between the boundaries of fiction and nonfiction. I believe this is a mix between the fiction and nonfiction worlds because it is imaginable to do this, but it is just not possible at all to do this so that makes this part of the storyline fiction. But then the rest of the time it is just like a normal life so it is in the world of nonfictionality. Overall, I really liked the movie Inception and it shows many characteristics of post modernism. Maybe you can see some other characteristics too! Inception is in the post modernism literary genre.

Modernism Project

Baym, Nina. "Ernest Hemingway." The Norton Anthology American Literature. 4th ed. Vol. 2. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Incorporated, 1979. 1633-1635. Print.

Dugan, Brenna. "What Is Modernism?" Utoledo.edu. The University of Toledo, 10 Apr. 2008. Web. 19 Apr. 2011. .

Grimes, Linda Sue. "Poetry Analysis: Symbols and Meanings of Langston Hughes' The Negro Speaks of Rivers." Suite101.com: Online Magazine and Writers' Network. 6 Jan. 2003. Web. 19 Apr 2011. .

Hemingway, Ernest. "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber." Fliiby. 2009. Web. 24 Apr. 2011. .

Hemingway, Ernest. "The Snows of Kilimanjaro." The Norton Anthology American Literature. 4th ed. Vol. 2. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Incorporated, 1979. 1635-651. Print.

Hughes, Lanston. "The Ballad of the Landlord." Old Poetry. 2009. Web. 19 Apr. 2011. .

Hughes, Langston. "The Negro Speaks of Rivers." Music and Texts of Gary Bachlund. 2008. Web. 19 Apr. 2011. .

Keane, Melba C. "Modernism, Some Characteristics." Utsc.utoronto.ca. The University of Toronto at Scarborough. Web. 19 Apr. 2011. .

Lorcher, Trent. "Modernism in Literature: What Is Modernism?" Find Health, Education, Science & Technology Articles, Reviews, How-To and Tech Tips At Bright Hub - Apply To Be A Writer Today! 26 Dec. 2009. Web. 19 Apr. 2011. .

Quinn, Edward. "free verse." A Dictionary of Literary and Thematic Terms, Second Edition. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2006.Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. Web. 19 Apr. 2011. .

Steinbeck, John. The Grapes of Wrath. New York: Penguin, 2006. Print.

Werlock, Abby H. P. "modernism." The Facts On File Companion to the American Short Story, Second Edition. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2009. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. Web. 19 Apr. 2011. .

Journal 43 - Jazz Song

So right now I am listening to this song and I am thinking of George Clooney and some movie similar to the Ocean series. I see him thinking of these clever ways to talk to Julia Roberts and things. The jam is breaking out now and we are riding through a limo through the fabulous streets of Las Vegas. Look to the left and BAM! Tigers on stage! Look to the right and BAM! 10,000 slots! Oh boy I just do not know which one to choose. I decided to walk into the Ceaser's Palace and I decide instantly that I am not in the real Ceaser's Palace. I go play some slots and every time I win. Sometimes it is not much, but I wine every time. I then flash and I am all of a sudden a super hero. I am flying through the air and I land in a park and save this little old lady's kitty out of a tree and I then stop a robbery in a bank that happens to be elaborately planned. But too bad! I then take off my super suit and go home to my family with my three children and everything is perfect in my life. My kids are all smiling and they all get along. THe food my wife cooked for us is fantastic. It is steak and potatoes. Then green beans and desserts as far as you can look. I walk down the street to get the mail and I see me neighbor, Louis Armstrong, rocking out on his trumpet. I stop there to listen to him and his elaborate songs. I then keep walking and I hear my other neighbor, Mallorie Lohman rocking out on her trombone. She is sliding the slide and hitting all of the notes at the indicated times and it sounds very good. The pace quickens and Kirk and Tucker are having a drum off! WHOA! Sweet. they come up on a rotating stage from their apartment complex! My day is complete and I turn into a super hero again and then I help George Clooney steal money from a casino.

Realism and Modernism

Realism is the author trying to depict real life as it actually existed (Werlock). It was in a kind of booming time of America. The country itself was expanding, getting more states, more land in the Pacific, bigger economy, more production, new industries. Things that we recognize today were all beginning basically in this time period. So realists tried to look at what actually happened. If there was a close person to the author that was depressed and the author choose to wrote about this person, the author would not cut anything out in that chosen person's life. He would talk about the person's feelings, the things they are thinking maybe, the physical things they may be doing to themselves. But anyway, they would not leave anything out and they would try to create a picture of that person. There was something I came across earlier in my realism reading, and that was that a realist is a photographer and they cannot choose the details in their photograph. Whatever is in the photograph was in it. Then there was a painter who was a naturalist and was able to choose what he wanted in the picture. That was the difference between the two. Some authors that were realists were people like Mark Twain who was very descriptive, Edgar Lee Masters, and Sojourner Truth. This movement was from the late 1850's to the early 1900's.

Modernism is kind of a revolution of realism. Modernists were from about World War I to the end of World War II. Modernism and Realism are obviously in different time periods, sure it may not be a big difference with fifteen years between the end of realism and the start of modernism, but there is a massive difference between the two. In the modernist period, women now had the right to vote, African Americans were not seen as the evil they once seemed, and America evolved into an isolationist country instead of an expansionist one. These are just some of the few differences between the two time periods. The modernists focused on what the American Dream had turned into. Modernists did not like what the American Dream had turned into so they started to make changes within their writing, art, music, and even the clothing they wore. One thing that evolved was the flappers. They wore much less clothing than women in previous generations. They kind of tested the boundaries so to say. Then there was the Harlem Renaissance. This Renaissance was a modernist movement that dealt with human emotion. This was different than realism in that it was feelings, and not just life as it existed. The members of the movement tried pushing racial integration and progressive politics and this could be seen from a modernist poet like Ezra Pound. With modernism there also came the new style of music, jazz. It was started in the south and it was a completely new form of music. It was a very emotion form of music, and could be played in a large variety of ways. This is also where a new form of art came about. Common were things like Plamer Hayden's watercolor and oil paintings.




Anderson, George Parker. "modernism." In Anderson, George P., Judith S. Baughman, Matthew J. Bruccoli, and Carl Rollyson, eds. Encyclopedia of American Literature, Revised Edition: Into the Modern: 1896–1945, Volume 3. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2008. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. Web. April 6, 2011.

Werlock, Abby H. P. "realism." The Facts On File Companion to the American Short Story, Second Edition. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2009. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. Web. April 6, 2011.

Job Shadowing Experience

So what I did for my job shadowing day was I followed some Physical and Occupational Therapists. I went to Memorial Medical Center and I got sent up to Independence Square. It was kind of funny. I walked into the room and guess who is there. Sarah, the young lady which my mom works with who also happens to work there apparently. So I talked to her for a while. It was really quite funny that I saw them there. But then after they hunted down my physical therapist, I started to shadow her. Her name was Laura and all we really did was help one older lady who had fallen several times and had recently fallen into the bathtub in January and had had some spinal issues from that fall. It affected her right side of the body and Laura was helping her become more balanced and walk farther without a cane. Then another funny thing happened. I look up and I see Kaylee, who is an occupational therapist. This is the lady who used to work with my mom and who used to have that same position as the previously mentioned Sarah. I talked to her for a little while and then by the time that was done Laura's next patient came in. We were just sitting her down when I look up and I see Hillary and Emily. Hillary graduated from here last year and Emily is my youth pastor's wife who is an occupational therapist. So I said hi. But I had to go with Laura. This lady had tendonitis in her right arm and all we had to do were do some ultra sound on her and teach her some exercises. By the time we were done with this patient it was the time that Laura was done with her shift and then I went to lunch with previously mentioned Emily and Hillary. I think that this shadowing experience exceeded my expectation just because of the patients we saw and the people who I knew that were in the department. Every one there was really nice and insightful about the career. I do not think that I could be a physical therapist because I cannot be confined to the indoors. I have no walls in my life and I do not want one in my career. I think I learned a valuable lesson because I found out that I do not want to do this career.

Journal 42 - Dickinson or Whitman

If I were alive in Walt Whitman's or Emily Dickinson's time, then I would definitely read Walt Whitman's literature over Emily Dickinson's. Walt Whitman was just a beast. True, Emily Dickinson's writing was more accepted at this time than Walt Whitman's, but Whitman's was just so much better than Dickinson's. There were so many different meanings to Walt Whitman's poems and writings that it made it way more fun to read than Dickinson's. If I were alive at this time though, I probably would not be reading at all. I would be too busy farming and driving horse buggies around. Maybe living in a small house on the Prairie. So I do not think that I would have actually been reading any writing at all, except for maybe the Bible because it was like the only accepted book at the time. This time period, the mid 1800s, was a very boring time period. People had nothing to do outside of live on the prairie, make fires, and farm. Then they would live in the same house for their whole lives which would be very unexciting. I mean I would not really mind living in this time period because I do not particularly enjoy television, computers, or telephones. This is true that it makes things bearable when it is boring, but for the most part, I do not need them in my life. I think that if I did indeed live in this time period, then I would be an explorer. I probably would have discovered Atlantis or something crazy like that. But I much prefer Whitman's writings over Emily Dickinson's writings because there are so many different ways you can take this one poem. Yes, there is only one set of words, but there are several different ways to interpret the poem. IT IS JUST SO EXCITING! So if you were counting votes, then I believe that over the consensus of this English class, Whitman would over power the voting polls.

I Shall Know Why, When Time Is Over Analysis

"I Shall Know Why, When Time Is Over" is a poem about how once Emily Dickinson, the author of this poem, dies, God or Jesus or "Christ" as she says, will teach her about life. This will explain everything to her and she will have no questions or anguish any longer. It is a very peaceful and relaxing tone that says you may struggle during life, but once you die, you will have no more severe mental or physical pain. That is just a very nice thing to think about. I want that to happen to me because if you work hard during your life then you will be rewarded with "Christ's" knowledge of life's struggles and tests. To me this would be a very useful key to have during life, but as this poem says, you are not rewarded with this knowledge until after you die and you are in the afterlife. "I shall know why, when time is over,/ And I have ceased to wonder why;/ Christ will explain each separate anguish/ In the fair schoolroom of the sky./ He will tell me what Peter promised,/ And I, for wonder at his woe,/ I shall forget the drop of anguish/ That scalds me now, that scalds me now" (Dickinson). So as we take a look into this poem, we ran see that Emily Dickinson says that she will know why after she has ceased to wonder why when her time is over, or in her death. She says Christ, which I presume is Jesus, will explain each individual time of anguish, or time or severe mental or physical pain while they are in a classroom type environment in the sky. It is said to be known that heaven is in the sky above the clouds, so this classroom would be in the clouds. She tells him to explain Peter's promise of staying with Jesus even with the possible consequence of death. We are all familiar with this story of Jesus being tried in the courthouse and Peter staying outside. Jesus tells Peter he will deny him three time before the crow calls. Peter was just like no way Jesus, not me, you are awesome and I will not deny you. But sure enough, Peter ends up denying Jesus three times and still Jesus forgives him. This story is read all the time at my church and it is a good example of the Lord's mercy on all of us. But Jesus will explain this promise that Peter made to Jesus but did not keep. Then Dickinson will forget about the pain that is "scalding" her now because of the sorrow that Peter felt to Jesus for breaking this promise. I thought this poem was a very nice poem that draws in both emotions that she feels as a human like anguish, and mixing into the afterlife with Jesus. Then on top of that she brings in a very recognizable story from the Bible that only deeper embeds the meaning of "I Shall Know Why When Time Is Over."



Dickinson, Emily. "I Shall Know Why, When Time Is Over." Bartleby.com. 2011. Web. 22 Mar. 2011. .

Ashes denote that fire was - Emily Dickinson

"Ashes denote that fire was" is a poem by Emily Dickinson that in my mind is very respectful to the elder people or the people who passed away of the world who have retired, or have just gotten old. It tells of how they once lived well, and had the fire inside, but now they are just ashes after the fire has burned. They had lived, but now are just old, or passed away looking back on the life that was once theirs. "Ashes denote that fire was;/ Respect the grayest pile/ For the departed creature’s sake/ That hovered there awhile./ Fire exists the first in light;/ And then consolidates,—/ Only the chemist can disclose/ Into what carbonates" (Dickinson). When we look at the literal meaning, we see that Dickinson is talking about ashes. She says that ashes give us the reason to believe that there was once a fire in place of the ashes. She tells us to respect these ashes that was designated a fire. Respect it for the dead animal's reason that was around the once present fire. Fire is first during the light, because fire is light; it sheds light as the fire burns. Dickinson then tells us that the fire comes together to be one force. One may think that fire is already a unified substance/ thing/ object/ whatever you want to call it. But if you think harder about how fire works, it really is not one substance. There are several licks of the fire that are all working separately to burn. Then, in the poem, Dickinson tells us that only a chemist can release the information about what the fire burns into. When we look at this poem from a deeper meaning, we can see that Emily Dickinson deeply respect the dead and elder people. We could say that the ashes are death and the fire is life. Then the chemist is God. We live, we shed light or life. We then die and only God can tell us who you were in your life with your death.




Dickinson, Emily. "Ashes Denota That Fire Was." Bartleby.com. 2011. Web. 22 Mar. 2011. .

Journal 40 - My Self

In class, and also outside of class through homework, we have been searching for Walt Whitman's definition of his Self. We have come to the conclusion that although his poetry may be repetitive at times, boring at times, and quite obscene a lot of the time, that Whitman's Self was broken into three categories. The first was his soul. The second was his inner self. And his third was the real him. I think if I were to assess my Self, there would be way more than just three parts to me. The things that make me myself are first, my parents. They have had the biggest impact on my life because they taught me to walk, talk, read, and so many other things. Then there would be my friends who also influence me in many ways and teach me things I do not know. A third piece would be Danbury, Iowa. That small town of three hundred and thirty people has had a giant impact on my life. I can handle the small towns, the conservative farmers, and the boring-ness. I spent the first twelve years of my life there. I learned practically every thing in my life in that small town and it is a part of. Then there are the obvious things, like my thoughts that make me me. People may be able to influence others, but the part that no one can control is one's mind. This is the strongest thing in the world that no one has control of. There is the way I act, the things I do, the reactions I make that make me me. It is because of these motions I make that give people an idea of who I actually am. A large part of me is death. I am not saying that I have had a lot of deaths in my family, but I have had a few. Like my Grandma who died before a time I can remember. My uncle Buzz. My Aunt Sue. Things like these made me grow in my relationships and made me hold on to the few close ones that I share with people.

Look Down Fair Moon Analysis

"Look Down Fair Moon" is a very peaceful poem in my mind about Walt Whitman asking the moon to bathe the earth with its beautiful light. The poem reads, "LOOK down fair moon and bathe this scene,/ Pour softly down night's nimbus floods on faces ghastly, swollen, purple,/ On the dead on their backs with arms toss'd wide,/ Pour down your unstinted nimbus sacred moon" (Whitman). We can take this poem in a literal meaning. Whitman is telling the fair moon to look down upon this scene, maybe the earth. He tells it to softly lighten the ghastly, swollen, and purple face with the moon's light aura. He then tells the moon to pour down its unrestrainted, shadowy light on the dead of people's backs with their arms open wide. From this literal meaning it does sound kind of creepy yes. But we can think of Whitman asking the moon just to light up the world even in the night when it is dark. He wants the world to be lit so people do not have to hide. When we think of the poem in this way, it really is quite beautiful and to me it is very peaceful. We can also think of "Look Down Fair Moon" as seen from a Christianity or spiritual stand point. We could say that the moon represents God or religion. Whitman is telling God to see the world as it is and send down "nimbus floods" into ugly faces. One definition of nimbus is "a luminous cloud or a halo surrounding a supernatural being or a saint" (Dictionary.com). So these nimbus floods could be Jesus since he is God's son and he was sent down to save the people of this planet. He says he wants God to hit them in the dead of their back and the people will have their arms open wide ready to great this God. Then he wants God to give no restraint in sending down this "nimbus sacred moon" (Whitman). This is where we really see Whitman's spirituality come out and show itself. He wants God to come to earth and let his presence be known. There is evil on the planet and "face ghastly, swollen, purple" (Whitman), or ugly faces. Evil faces. He wants Jesus to come and save the people. We can I suppose also look at "Look Down Fair Moon" from Walt Whitman's Everyman concept as well. Whitman's Everyman concept basically says that everyone is the same, and collectively people are God. So that makes him, me, you all God. That is what his everyman concept is in a nut shell. So when we look at this poem form Whitman's Everyman concept, then we could say the moon represents people's nature. He is calling for people to come out of their evil ways and opening up their inner God. He wants people to embrace their inner God and for these people to rain down their sacred human nature. If all people would do this, then we would see a better world and a more peaceful one. Overall I really thought this poem was just a good one all the way around and I really enjoyed the meaning of making the world a better place.



Dictionary.com | Free Online Dictionary for English Definitions. Web. 06 Mar. 2011. .

Whitman, Walt. "Look Down Fair Moon." The Walt Whitman Archive. 2011. Web. 6 Mar. 2011. .

I Am He That Aches With Love Analysis

The poem "I Am He That Aches With Love" is a poem written by Walt Whitman. So whenever we read poems or really just anything we can have several different ways of interpreting what the poem actually means. We can look at it from the literal way where everything that is written down is actually what Whitman wanted us to read it as. There is the Everyman view point that has the main character be a common every day man. There is a Christianity and Spiritual viewpoint where the things in the poem are symbolic in the stories and symbols of religion or God. There is also an American view point where Whitman just writes about America. When we look at "I Am He That Aches With Love," "I am he that aches with amorous love;/ Does the earth gravitate? does not all matter, aching, attract all matter?/ So the body of me to all I meet or know" (Whitman). When we first look at it from a literal point, we see that Whitman identifies himself as a man who urges for sexual love and satisfaction. He then asks whether the Earth has a gravitational pull and if matter attracts matter. He then offers his body to any one he meets or knows. This could be said that since all matter is attracted to matter, that he is attracted to all people since they too are matter. From this we can conclude that when he offers his body to anyone he meets, he is offering sex to them as well. From the literal meaning, this poem is very sexual. When we look at this poem from the Everyman view point, we see that the "I" in the poem is the average citizen and this average citizen wants sexual love or satisfaction. And from being attracted to everyone they want to offer their body to any one they may meet. This citizen could be any one, and in from this viewpoint, the meanings of both the literal view point and the Everyman view point are the same except Whitman's role is now switched with a common man. When we view "I Am He That Aches With Love" from a Christianity and Spiritual view point, we could say that the "I" is God. And this sexual feeling of love represents religion. Because all matter is attracted to all matter, then we can say that God is offering religion to any one it meets or knows. This is generally true for religion and God as it is offered to any one of any class, race, or sex. So when we switch from a literal or Everyman view point to a spiritual view point, we can see there is a different meaning to it. Viewed from a Whitman America view point, "I Am He That Aches With Love" is seen once again as a totally different meaning. The "I" represents America and the sexual love could be the American Dream. So America has this feeling of offering anyone (other people) this American dream. At this point in time (1891-1892), America saw one of its greatest immigration totals ever. Millions of people were coming to America.


Whitman, Walt. "I Am He That Aches With Love." The Walt Whitman Archive. 2011. Web. 2 Mar. 2011. .

Journal 39 - Bardic Symbols

"Bardic Symbols" is a poem written by Walt Whitman. This poem is very reflective of his Everyman, America, and Christianity/ spirituality concepts. He interweaves these brilliantly to make "Bardic Symbols" a classic poem of these ages. When I read this poem the first thing that I observed when I read this poem was the America concept. It says, "As I walked where the sea-ripples wash you, Paumanok," (Whitman). Paumanok is a Native American phrase that means long island, which just so happens to be an island in New York. He then realizes as he is walking along this beach of long island, that he will never understand his existence. He talks of the ocean as a fierce mother and that could be the mother. The land could be the father. The twigs on the beach could be the children of this mother and father. Whitman says he does not understand existence is because as he is watching these twigs on the beach going back and forth from land to the sea and back again, he wonders what the point of existence is. He just does understand it. "Kiss me, my father!/ Touch me with your lips, as I touch those I love!/ Breathe to me, while I hold you close, the secret of the wondrous murmuring I envy!/ For I fear I shall become crazed, if I cannot emulate it, and utter myself as well/ as it" (Whitman).When we look from The Christianity concept we can think of instead of the father being Whitman's actual father, this father could be God. He says he loves God and he wants to remain close to God for all of his life. He is afraid of straying and he wants God to lead him in on the right path. When we look at William Dean Howells's reaction to "Bardic Symbols," we are not given a clear vision of what this poem represents. Howells jsut tells of how no one is Whitman and therefore no on e can understand what "Bardic Symbols" represents.


Howells, William Dean. ""Bardic Symbols"" The Walt Whitman Archive. 2011. Web. 2 Mar. 2011. .


Whitman, Walt. "Bardic Symbols." The Walt Whitman Archive. 2011. Web. 2 Mar. 2011. .

This Dust Was Once the Man Analysis

In this poem, "This Dust Was Once the Man," written by Walt Whitman, we see a very meaningful and a very short poem. It talks of the civil war and how the Union was saved by the Civil War. But there is also a deep message of murder and controversy surrounding the war. "This dust was once the man,/ Gentle, plain, just and resolute, under whose cautious hand,/ Against the foulest crime in history known in any land or age,/ Was saved the Union of these States" (Whitman). This is the poem. You can tell however the meaning of the poem. There is first the literal meaning. This is talking about a form of dust that was once not dust and instead a man. It was an ordinary, nice, and purposeful man. Under this hand there was the worst crime in the time that no age or land has ever seen before. This crime saved the Union of the United States. This last line is of course referring to the Union the United States' states' share with each other. Before the Civil War there was at first one Union. Then states in the south with slavery began to leave the Union and they formed the Confederacy which was rival to the Union. There were thirteen states in this Confederacy and then that is when the Civil War was started. It was to join the states together once again. After the Civil War it was once again the Union hence the line of, "Was saved the Union of these States" (Whitman). But this is the literal meaning. . When we look at it from a Whitman point of view, we could say that the man with the cautious hand who allowed the worst crime ever to happen is Abraham Lincoln. Whitman rarely, but still did, write about Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was the President of the Union of the United States at this point in time. But Abraham Lincoln was the man who all of the Civil War happened under. He was often described as "Honest Abe." The point can be made that he was gentle with his words, and an ordinary man. He was also in the White House for a purpose. This terrible crime could be one of brothers fighting against brothers and turn the nation into a war against itself. This crime could refer to the hundreds of thousands of deaths that occurred during this war. The dust could also refer to the people who died during the war. This could all be brought to Abraham Lincoln even though many say he led the nation to becoming a whole nation once again; others could make the point he was the one who tore it apart in the first place. It all just depends on the perspective you are looking from. When we look at "This Dust Was Once the Man" from Whitman's Everyman concept, we can make the point that the man with the cautious hand was not Abraham Lincoln and that it was instead the soldiers of the war. This would then mean, that under a soldiers control and cautious hand, that the worst crime was committed. This crime could be the act of murder, a soldier killing another soldier, in battle. But these soldiers of the Union did save and bring the Union back together. So the Everyman concept is also a very valid perspective you could use.




"This Dust Was Once the Man. (Leaves of Grass [1891-1892])." The Walt Whitman Archive. . Web. Mar 1. 2011.

Journal 38 - Ploughman

When we look into Walt Whitman's "As I Watch'd the Ploughman Plowing," we see two sides of both Christianity and the Everyman concepts into it. This is much like many of his other poems and they can be taken either way. "As I watch’d the ploughman ploughing,/Or the sower sowing in the fields—or the harvester harvesting,/I saw there too, O life and death, your analogies:/(Life, life is the tillage, and Death is the harvest according)" (Whitman). When we look at this this poem from the Christianity concept, we see this ploughman, who potentially could be God. But there is this ploughman who is raising a field for a harvest and he is sowing the fields and tilling them. But then at the end, we are explained that the tillage is life and the harvest is death. This can be taken in multiple ways. We of course have the literal meaning of the poem where the ploughman is a farmer and the plant is alive throughout the course of the tilling and it then dies and is picked for its fruits. Then there is another meaning where the plant represents people and the ploughman is god and god grows the crops or people up into the beautiful crops and then we die, but the next season new crops are made or new people are born and grown once again. Then there is the meaning which I originally thought was in this poem. God once again represents the ploughman. The people are once again the crops. But this time god spends all of this time helping his crops or people grow to be good crops or people. Then the crops or people gradually become ready for harvesting and they are picked or the people die. But what a ploughman spends all of the hard work for is the reward of picking his crops in the harvest. So God has grown these people into what he wants them to be and now the people get to enjoy the reward of heaven.



Whitman, Walt. "As I Watch'd the Ploughman Ploughing." . Web. 23 Feb. 2011.

Journal 37 - RXN to Whitman's Language of the Self

Upon reading Mark Bauerlein's "Whitman's Language of the Self, I thought of many questions in my mind. Like What the heck is up with the rhetoric language of the Self; "If Whitman requires figurative language in order to speak or to write the self, even when aiming explicitly to unveil the self and not to clothe it in tropes, one wonders whether sheer self-expression of the kind Whitman prefigures is possible. If figurative language is the seminal ingredient of poetry, can Whitman compose a poem matching his self? Could he discover a pure language of the self, a language which, though thetorical, would have a new rhetoric based on the directions and idiosyncrasies of Whitman's desires, Whitman would create a poem unparalleled in its evocation of self" (Bauerlein). Yes, I do know this language does not really exist but it still confuses me quite a bit thinking about a language that can describe the type of person you are. It is just above my level of thinking. It is also a Sunday so my level of thinking is way down because I do not want to be doing any homework. I also already have a bad case of senior-itis. So that disease is not helping my motivation to think at the moment. Another thing in the essay that stood out to me was when Bauerlein talks of how Whitman was expansive and egotistical. Yes, at first glance, it would appear Whitman is very egotistical, but he really is not that bad. He is just a confident person and he shows this within his writings. I think that is is cool that Bauerlein almost goes into a psychological dissection of Whitman;'s brain. He talks of how things in his childhood may have given him this confidence. It is really quite amazing to think that there are stages in people's lives when they are children that give them confidence. He says that this "mirror stage" is when the self of people begin to form. So you are you before you think you are you.




Bauerlein, Mark. "Whitman's Language of the Self." American Imago 44, no. 2 (Summer 1987). Quoted as "Whitman's Language of the Self" in Bloom, Harold, ed. Song of Myself, Bloom's Modern Critical Interpretations. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishing, 2002. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts on File, Inc. . Web. Feb 26, 2011.

Journal 36 - Favorite Meal

I do not know if I have just one favorite meal. Most food is my friend. And by my friend I mean I like them. I have several meals that I would consider my favorite meal, and all of them are equally delicious. One favorite meal of mine, which we are having tonight, is steak, twice baked potatoes, and green bean casserole. Oh. My. Goodness. This is definitely my favorite summer meal by far. I usually do the grilling for my family and I grill the steaks to what I like to call perfection. Most professional grillers would not consider it perfection, but to me, it is so tasty. I grill the steaks to medium rare. They are nice and they look tasty on the outside, but then they leak a small amount of dark juice. As they are being grilled, I sprinkle first steak seasoning on it. Then I put some spicy broiled steak seasoning on it to give it a different but tasty flavor. Then they are served and yummy. Then the twice baked potatoes and green bean casserole are equally delicious. My mom makes the best twice baked potatoes in the history of man kind. Another one of my favorite meals would be just anything from Hu hot. Hu hot is an asian stir fry place in iowa that I went to last weekend when I was visiting my sister at Iowa State last weekend. But what happens is you go through this buffet type thing and then they cook it in front of you on a giant, extremely hot grill. But you grab a bowl, then you have three different kinds of noodles, all these vegetables and then there are things like lettuce, basically anything you can think of, they have it available. Then you pick sauces to put on it and you have to have at least six spoons of sauce, and I make my stir fry spicy because I love spicy food. It is hard to describe. But just imagine the best food possible and that is what Hu hot is.

Whitman's Self Reflection

In Walt Whitman’s writing and poetry, we see him search for his inner being; who he believes he is; his inner Self. As Matt Longabucco puts it, with Whitman, “This self is deeply split and not defined by circumstance” (Longabucco). This search for the definition of his Self is exemplified in his poem, “Excelsior”. In “Excelsior” we read Whitman asking questions of the people around him and he is saying he is the most cautious man in the world, or the proudest man in the world. It is hard to be all of these things at the same time, but he is searching for the definition of Self. He does not know which man he really is; he is just saying he is all of these things.
WHO has gone farthest? For lo! have not I gone farther?
And who has been just? For I would be the most just person of the earth;
And who most cautious? For I would be more cautious;
And who has been happiest? O I think it is I! I think no one was ever happier than I;
And who has lavish’d all? For I lavish constantly the best I have;
And who has been firmest? For I would be firmer;
And who proudest? For I think I have reason to be the proudest son alive—for I am the son of the brawny and tall-topt city;
This is a great example of how Whitman is in the process of searching for his definition of Self.
For Whitman, poetry were the songs of his life. He spent a majority of his lifetime writing poetry about the things around him, himself, and what he felt. When we read “When Lilacs Last in the Door-yard Bloom'd," Whitman creates this beautiful image of an outdoor scene. He describes basically a country farm scene with the picket fence and the tall grass growing around it. Then he focuses on lilacs, which are both symbols of death and new life. We see lilacs at both baptisms and funerals. He talks of how he envies death; “With loaded arms I come, pouring for you,/ For you, and the coffins all of you, O death” (Whitman, “When Lilacs”). In this poem, we read of sadness he feels, and you kind of get this feeling of depression because it is written for Abraham Lincoln, who was dead. “Then with the knowledge of death as walking one side of me, /And the thought of death close-walking the other side of me,/ And I in the middle, as with companions, and as holding the hands of companions,” (Whitman, “When Lilacs”). This establishes the acknowledgement that he knows eventually he is going to die. He knows he is on life’s path with death closing in on him and he just is calling for the lilacs to bloom so he can join Abraham Lincoln and God in heaven.
In “As I Watch’d the Ploughman Ploughing,” we see a huge symbolic reference that is even pointed out to us. We read,
AS I watch’d the ploughman ploughing,
Or the sower sowing in the fields—or the harvester harvesting,
I saw there too, O life and death, your analogies:
(Life, life is the tillage, and Death is the harvest according.)
We are once again presented with an image of both life and death. I believe by seeing this poem, Whitman had a strong feeling of death. Since death is the harvest in “As I Watch’d the Ploughman Ploughing,” we can also believe that with death, comes the fruit of your labor, as is corn or beans to farmers. Whitman might have believed that once he died and passed on to the next world, he would be rewarded with great things, like farmers were with money and food. This is a big part of what I believe Whitman painted as his Self. Whitman may have been a spiritual man who wanted to see the Lord and heaven.
According to Harold Bloom, Whitman’s Self was composed of, “my soul, my self, and the real me or me” (Bloom). “My soul” is his spiritual self. In Whitman’s world, spirituality was huge and God was a part of every person, meaning Whitman too, was God. As a collective whole, the human race was God. This is why we see so much spirituality in his poems, because Whitman was a spiritual man. “My self” is his personality. This how he acts on a daily basis. We see this through his writings and the various moods he is in. One day he could be happy, and his poems are happy; one day he could be sad, and his poems are sad. The “real me” was others perception of Whitman. This is who Whitman actually was and what other people thought of Whitman. These three components are what made up Whitman’s Self.




Longabucco, Matt. "'The Proof of a Poet'—Walt Whitman and His Critics." In Bloom, Harold, ed. Walt Whitman, Bloom's BioCritiques. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishing, 2002. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. . Web. Feb 23, 2011.
Bloom, Harold. "Bloom on Walt Whitman." In Bloom, Harold, ed. Walt Whitman, Classic Critical Views. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 2007. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. . Web. Feb 26, 2011.
Whitman, Walt. "As I Watch'd the Ploughman Ploughing." . Web. 23 Feb. 2011.
Whitman, Walt. "Excelsior." . Web. 23 Feb. 2011.
Whitman, Walt. "When Lilacs Last in the Door-yard Bloom’d." . Web. 23 Feb. 2011.

Journal 35 - Reporter in War

I think that if I was a reporter covering a war and being in the fighting zone, in the trenches, I would be freaked out because of the bombs blowing up in my sight and the bullets that are wizzing by my ear. You see, I am not a person who likes to get involved in very many fights, if any, let alone with knifes, guns, the occasional cannons, bombs, fighter jets, and fighter jets dropping bombs onto the guns that will blow up and sound like a cannon. I would probably not last long in a war zone. If I did however go against my beliefs as a person that reporters all suck at life and have nothing to contribute to society other than tell us what just happened, I would try to get the most information possible. I would probably really annoy the soldiers in the process of doing this. I would just be hanging out and asking them questions while they are trying to shoot their enemies heads off. I am also sure that most of the stuff that I would come up with would no way be able to be reported to the people because there is probably some bogus law that prohibits it. So that would kind of make that reporting a little bit stupid to be doing in the first place. My father was in a war zone and he said he was involved in a couple of firefights while he was there for thirteen months. He said he felt very safe the whole time because he just had to sit in the fun-vee, as Robert Downey Jr. likes to call it, and watch the people fight. So he knew he would be safe. But I would have to think differently because there are still all of these bombs going off around you and there are people legitimately trying to kill you. That thought is just not too soothing as you can imagine. All in all, I would get the job done, but I would be terrible and it would all be for nothing.